resources

Williams v. Beemiller

Case Status: Active
New York · July 28, 2005

Background

16-year-old Daniel “Bud” Williams, a high school basketball star about to start his junior year, was shooting baskets outside his home in Buffalo, NY on August 16, 2003 when he was severely wounded in a drive-by shooting. As Williams picked up his basketball, a man in a car parked on the street opened fire, hitting Bud in the stomach. The assailants sped off, but police quickly apprehended the shooter, Cornell Caldwell, in possession of a Hi-Point 9mm semi-automatic pistol. Investigation revealed that Caldwell shot Williams mistakenly thinking he was a rival gang member.

The handgun used in the shooting was traced to gunrunner James Nigel Bostic, who according to The Buffalo News purchased at least 250 handguns at Dayton, Ohio gun shows between May and October 2000. Almost 200 of these guns were obtained from dealer and distributor Charles Brown, from whom Bostic purchased mostly Hi-Point Saturday Night Special handguns in bulk sales for under $100 each before trafficking them to Buffalo, where Bostic sold them on the street for two to three times his purchase price.

The carnage wrought by Bostic’s trafficking ring was the subject of a June 2005 four-part series in the Buffalo News entitled “The Damage Done,” which exposed the deadly role that gun traffickers and the gun industry play in supplying firearms to dangerous criminals.



Lawsuit

On July 28, 2005, the Brady Center filed a lawsuit on behalf of Daniel Williams and his family against the gun companies responsible for arming gang member Cornell Caldwell through their alleged negligence. According to the suit, James Bostic and his girlfriend, Kimberly Upshaw, purchased guns from Charles Brown at an Ohio gun show on five occasions, including a single sale of 87 identical handguns, one of which was used to shoot and injure Williams. The suit also argues that though Bostic committed obvious straw purchases by having girlfriends fill out the paperwork while he selected and paid for the guns, Brown did nothing to prevent these clearly illegal sales.

The lawsuit contends that it should have been obvious to Charles Brown that Bostic was not buying almost 200 guns for his personal use, but that he intended to sell those guns on the criminal market. According to the suit, in addition to the guns recovered in Buffalo, crime guns sold by Brown and his company included 630 guns that had been recovered in connection with New York City crimes, and a semiautomatic rifle used in the 1999 Columbine High school massacre.

Daniel Williams’ case against Brown and Hi-Point has been one of the longest in Legal Action Project history. The defendants spent four years on an unsuccessful attempt to have the case moved to federal court, before ultimately filing a motion to dismiss the case on the grounds that it was barred by the federal Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA). This argument was accepted by a trial court judge, who dismissed the case on April 25, 2011 and denied a motion for reargument four months later.

The Brady Center then successfully appealed the decision to the New York Appellate Division, which unanimously overturned the dismissal of the case; the court accepted Brady’s arguments and reinstated the case on October 5, 2012, and denied a motion for another argument on February 1, 2013. The appeals court’s ruling was a landmark decision: for the first time since the passage of PLCAA, a court ruled that a gun manufacturer and distributor can be held liable for supplying guns to traffickers. This precedent won by the Brady Center strikes a direct blow to the gun lobby’s attempt to shield the industry from responsibility for their role in fueling gun violence.

The case has now returned to the trial court and is currently in discovery. In addition to the Brady legal team, Williams is represented by Terrence M. Connors and a team from his Buffalo law firm Connors & Vilardo, LLP.


Back to Litigation
Related Legal Cases

Types of Gun Violence

Calling out Manufacturers Supplying Criminal Firearms in Gary

Indiana Supreme Court upholds City of Gary’s claims of unlawful marketing and negligent gun sales by various gun manufacturers for contributing to gun violence in Illinois.

City of Gary v. Smith & Wesson

Justice for Oregon Mother Fatally Shot with Online Gun

Brady won a major victory reforming the online gun industry and working to prevent future illegal sales after murder of mother of two.

Englund v. J&G Sales & World Pawn Exchange

Effects of Gun Violence

Gag Law Struck Down in Docs v Glocks

Victory in the 11th Circuit striking down an unconstitutional law preventing doctors from discussing health risks of gun ownership.

FL Gag rule, Wollschlaeger v. Scott

NRA Influence in ATF Policies Exposed

Seeking answers in court regarding ATF’s dangerous regulatory practices.

Brady v. ATF - FOIA Lawsuits

Negligent Missouri Gun Dealer Held Accountable for Man’s Death

Brady won a landmark victory against a negligent gun dealer in the Missouri Supreme Court, allowing the case to proceed to trial. The gun dealer settled for $2.2 million after negligently selling a gun to a woman with mental illness who used it to kill her father.

Delana v. Odessa Gun & Pawn

Texas Gun Dealer Agrees to Reform Business Practices

A Texas gun dealer agreed to implement significant business reforms after it sold a gun to a dangerous purchaser who used the firearm to kill his father-in-law.

Mata v. Pioneer Pawn

Types of Gun Violence

Seeking Justice in Missouri For Eight-Year-Old Killed by Father

After a 10 year legal battle, the Kansas Supreme Court held that a mother could seek justice from gun dealer who sold a firearm to her husband, a convicted felon, to kill her eight-year-old son.

Shirley v. Glass

Types of Gun Violence

Gun Dealer Held Accountable for Arming Shooters in DC Sniper Case

Brady held a gun dealer accountable for supplying firearms to the shooters who killed 17 people and injured seven others in the DC sniper attacks.

Johnson v. Bull's Eye

Types of Gun Violence

Justice for Lifelong Chicagoan Killed with a Trafficked Gun

Brady holds gun dealers accountable for selling trafficked firearms to the criminal market which were later used to shoot and kill a native son of the South Side, war veteran, and Chicago Police Officer while on duty.

Wortham v. Ed's Pawn Shop

Types of Gun Violence

Gun Manufacturer Held Accountable in Death of Seven-Year-Old

Brady sued a gun manufacturer for not including crucial safety features that would have prevented the death of a seven-year old boy.

Jefferson v. Sauers

Gun Dealer Held Accountable for Arming Man with Mental Illness

A gun dealer is no longer in business after Brady sued them for negligently selling a firearm to a man with mental illness who later shot and killed three people.

Allen v. Lock N Load

Justice for Officers Injured by Career Criminal

Brady facilitated a $1 million settlement between a firearms dealer and officers.

McGuire and Lemongello v. Will's

Types of Gun Violence

Online Gun Sellers Supply Firearms Used in Shooting Rampage

Brady filed suit in case where prohibited person with domestic violence restraining order went on a shooting rampage at his wife’s workplace with firearm obtained through ArmsList.

Daniel v. Armslist

Types of Gun Violence

Las Vegas: Uncovering the Truth About Bump Stocks

Lawsuit filed against Slide Fire Solutions, which invented bump stocks and claims its main purpose is to assist those with limited hand mobility, as its founder boasts of its mimicry of automatic gun fire.

Prescott et al v. Slide Fire Solutions

Straw Purchasers Accountable in Death of Pennsylvania Police Officer and US Marine

Brady filed suit and judge dismissed gun dealer’s preliminary objections, allowing case to push forward and hold dealers accountable when straw purchased firearms get distributed to prohibited persons while still on their property.

Fox v. In Site Firearms

Justice Won for Family of Officer Slain By Straw Purchased Gun

Recognizing the importance of stopping straw purchases such as the one that resulted in the injury of Officer Runnels, KS&E agreed to continue to follow specific policies and guidelines to prevent straw purchasers and others prohibited from possessing firearms from obtaining firearms at its store.

Runnels v. KS&E Sports

Negligent Gun Dealer Forced to Close

Brady successfully settles for $2 million with Kansas Gun dealer, which was forced to close its doors for its extremely negligent business practices which resulted workplace shooting.

Luke v. A Pawn Shop

Victory for Cincinnati Against Gun Manufacturers

Ohio Supreme Court reverses lower court judgement dismissing claims of a municipality against a myriad of gun manufacturers for their distribution of firearms used in crimes within the city of Cincinnati.

City of Cincinnati v. Beretta

Fighting for Family of Man Killed with Antique Gun Sold to Felon

Brady Legal and Cooper & Elliott Lawsuit Against Cabela’s on Behalf of a Gun Violence Victim Leads to Reforms of Sales Practices Regarding Black Powder Guns

Galliher v. Cabela’s

Holding Major Gun Dealer Accountable for Arming the Streets of Wilmington

Keshall "Keke" Anderson, a 19-year-old mother, was killed in a crossfire while walking in Wilmington by a gun sold to a trafficker through a straw purchase.

Summers v. Cabela’s

Seeking Justice for Victims of Sutherland Springs

Fighting to hold a major Texas gun dealer accountable for arming the mass shooter who killed 26 worshipers at the First Baptist Church.

Sutherland Springs

SETTLEMENT REACHED WITH GUN DEALER THAT SUPPLIED FIREARMS TO NOTORIOUS SERIAL KILLER

Fighting to hold gun dealer accountable for selling firearms to a straw purchaser who armed a now convicted serial killer.

Carver, Coxie v. Academy Sports + Outdoors, Coxie v. Academy Sports + Outdoors

Beretta Needs Design Change to Protect Against Family Fire

Brady's lawsuit prompts significant state legislation requiring manufacturers to include more effective safety features on their firearms.

Dix v. Beretta

Landmark Precedent Set Requiring Safety Features

New Mexico Court of Appeals rules in favor of Brady and the family of Sean Smith, who was injured as a result of an unintentional discharge. The Court ruled that Bryco should have included safety features to ensure that users know if there is a bullet in the chamber.

Smith v. Bryco

Seeking Justice for Unintentional Shooting of 13-year-old

Brady is seeking to hold a gun manufacturer accountable for not including a reasonable safety feature that would have prevented the unintentional shooting of a 13-year old boy.

Gustafson v. Springfield Armory

First Suit in MA Against Online Gun Retailer

Brady puts a dent in the formerly Teflon-coated internet gun industry, filing a case on behalf of injured police officer.

Stokinger v. Armslist

Deerfield Park

Brady assist in defending the village of Deerfield ban on assault weapons and high capacity magazines against challenge by a gun rights group.

SCOTUS Amicus Filed to Keep Firearms from Domestic Abusers

Brady filed an Amicus brief on behalf of the government extending the Gun Control’s Act of 1968’s prohibition on the possession of firearms to persons convicted of “a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence.”

United States v. Hayes

SCOTUS Amicus Filed Defending Firearms Ban for Domestic Violence Misdemeanors

Filed an Amicus brief to uphold the ban on domestic abusers possession of firearms.

United States v. Castleman

Amicus Brief in US Supreme Court to protect victims of domestic violence

Filed another Amicus in support of the ban on the possession of firearms by domestic violence abusers.

Voisine v. United States

Types of Gun Violence

Amicus Brief Challenges the Charleston Loophole

Following the devastating Charleston church shooting Brady filed an amicus brief before the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals seeking to close a loophole that allowed the shooting to obtain the firearm used in the shooting.

Sanders v. US

Effects of Gun Violence

Court Decides Citizen Have Right Not to be Armed

Struck down an unconstitutional city ordinance that required every household to own a firearm.

Nelson, GA

Emerging Dangers

Fighting Unregulated Make-Your-Own-Guns

Holding the State Department accountable for their dangerous decision to allow the blueprints of 3-D guns to be uploaded to the internet.

Brady v. State Department

Government Inaction in Regulating Gun Industry Exposed

Uncovered government documents exposing a NRA influence and lack of oversight against the gun industry.

Turk Memo

Types of Gun Violence

Pittsburgh Police Fight to Trace Crime Guns

Brady assists the city of Pittsburgh in protecting its ordinance to ensure crime guns can be adequately traced and that police can investigate firearms stolen from law-abiding gun owners.

Pittsburgh v. NRA

Defending Chicago Suburb’s Assault Weapon Ban

Brady assist in defending the village of Deerfield ban on assault weapons and high capacity magazines against challenge by a gun rights group.

Guns Save Lives v. Deerfield Park

Types of Gun Violence

Boston v. Smith & Wesson

In the early 2000s, Boston experienced a significant increase in violence perpetrated with firearms. Boston, with the help of Brady, began litigation against the gun industry to address this gun violence problem.

Landmark Settlement with Smith & Wesson and Clinton Administration

Landmark settlement between major gun manufacturer, paved by litigation.

Smith & Wesson Settlement

Types of Gun Violence

Cities Seek Accountability Throughout 90’s

In the late 1990s, lawsuits spearheaded by Brady on behalf of over 30 major cities nationwide exposed the role of the gun industry in supplying the criminal gun market and won several landmark court decisions

City Cases

Types of Gun Violence

Amicus Brief in Supreme Court Promotes Justice for Teen Killed by CBP

Brady filed an amicus brief to support the family of an unarmed fifteen-year-old boy who was shot and killed by a rogue CBP officer. The boy's parents are seeking to hold the officer who shot their son accountable and the Supreme Court will consider whether or not the courts can recognize their claim.

Hernandez v. Mesa

Effects of Gun Violence

Brady, Co-Council Torgenson Law Files Suit Against Glock Inc on Behalf of Paralyzed Victim

Travieso v. Glock Inc. and Glock Ges.m.b.H

Goldstein v Earnest

Brady Legal files a lawsuit on behalf of the victims and survivors of the Chabad of Poway Synagogue shooting against the manufacturer, Smith & Wesson, and seller of the gun.

Goldstein v Earnest

McFadyden v Ghost Gunner Inc.

Brady Legal brings the nation's first two civil lawsuits by victims of gun violence against the ghost gun industry.

Mayor & City Council of Baltimore v. Polymer80, Inc. and Hanover Armory, LLC, C.A.

Matthew Mueller and Mary Mueller v. Oxford Community School District and Acme Shooting Goods, LLC

Towner v. Century Arms LLC

Green v. Kyung Chang Industry USA, Inc.